Archaeological Archaeology Essay Nature Research

Archaeological Archaeology Essay Nature Research-29
By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies.We use cookies to offer you a better experience, personalize content, tailor advertising, provide social media features, and better understand the use of our services.Archaeology ultimately plays a minor role in the arguments proposed.

Tags: English Language As Level Coursework AryCanadian National Identity EssaysEmily Dickinson Essay TopicsEssays On Conflict Resolution In SchoolsDrama Coursework CrucibleEssay On LoyaltyTheir Eyes Were Watching God Critical Essay

Two factors make their dispute a particularly favourable case.

Firstly, both researchers brought together, in their respective disciplines, considerable experience in empirical research and reflexive skill.

The above reference to the 1987 meetings illustrates the difficulties regarding the integration of archaeology into the social sciences, even in an institution which is specifically dedicated to them, such as the EHESS.

This can be measured by both the limited numbers of archaeologists, and the equally tenuous position held by their specific knowledge and concepts.

In 1987, the discussion days at the EHESS focused on the “Problems and objectives of social science research” and took place in Marseille (5 and 6 June) and Montrouge (12 and 13 June).

Having read the programme of papers, Courbin decided to write to the president of the École, Marc Augé: he wished to bring to his attention that “1.Can we be sure, however, that we are dealing with descriptions of these relationships between disciplines and not prescriptions of what they should be?This is far from certain, and the juxtaposition of disciplines regularly appears to be the most frequent relational operator.Archaeology has featured among these disciplines since the creation, in 1960, of a (research director) chair at the École pratique des hautes études (EPHE; the EHESS was established in 1975, by splitting from the EPHE).This was created for Paul Courbin (1922-1994), a Hellenistic archaeologist who, in 1967, founded and ran a research department focused on archaeological methods, within the EPHE (Darcque, 1996: 319).This case study enables us to explore the actual conceptual relationships between archaeology and the other sciences (as opposed to those wished for or prescribed).The contrasts between the positions declared by the two researchers and the rooting of their arguments in their disciplines are examined: where the sociologist makes use of his philosophical training, the archaeologist relies mainly on his work on semiology and informatics.So as not to resign ourselves too quickly to the idea that such juxtaposition is the only possible method, I will examine a dispute which presented the most favourable conditions for real conceptual movement.This argument saw two researchers from the EHESS oppose each other: the archaeologist Jean-Claude Gardin and the sociologist Jean-Claude Passeron (1930-).To learn more or modify/prevent the use of cookies, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.The issue of the definition and position of archaeology as a discipline is examined in relation to the dispute which took place from 1980 to 2009 between the archaeologist Jean-Claude Gardin and the sociologist Jean-Claude Passeron.


Comments Archaeological Archaeology Essay Nature Research

The Latest from ©