As he writes:“Psychosynthesis is a scientific conception, and as such it is neutral towards the various religious forms and the various philosophical doctrines, excepting only those which are materialistic and therefore deny the existence of spiritual realities.” (1975, p.6-7)Even though Assagioli let his own metaphysical conceptions shine through, does not mean that students of Psychosynthesis cannot entertain their own thoughts about it.Assagioli was a human being who explored the great mystery himself, and he makes it clear that his psychology is based on his own phenomenological experience.
As he writes:“Psychosynthesis is a scientific conception, and as such it is neutral towards the various religious forms and the various philosophical doctrines, excepting only those which are materialistic and therefore deny the existence of spiritual realities.” (1975, p.Tags: Wine Shop Business PlanAdvertising Argumentative EssayInclement Weather Plan For BusinessAmerican Imperialism EssayGood Sociology EssayTherese Raquin Essay QuestionsHow To Write Literature Review In Research ProposalAutobiography Of A Bicycle EssaysSchool Uniforms Mandatory EssayProblem Solving Programs
I also recognized an issue with Assagioli’s metaphysics.
Psychosynthesis meets all the criteria characterising the Integral Model of the American thinker Ken Wilber, which he defines in relation to his ideas on Integral Spirituality.
It seemed clear that Assagioli’s Seven Core Concepts could be linked to seven developmental ways: Freedom, Presence, Power, Focus, Flow, Abundance, and Love Love.
These core concepts and developmental ways form the main focus of this book. Assagioli’s psychology is widely inclusive and contains numerous philosophical and psychological perspectives; one can easily get lost in cosmic thoughts concerning creation and our place in it.
Psychosynthesis, then, could also be located within the framework of a particular philosophical tradition, something I could not address in my MA.
When reading the Psychosynthesis literature written after Assagioli’s death, we often find it compared to a wide variety of metaphysical and philosophical schools, for example yoga, Jewish mysticism, Gnosticism, Neo-Platonism, theosophy and other esoteric traditions. Assagioli was an integral thinker who embraced and explored many different philosophies.Yet it also makes the task of defining the essence of his Psychosynthesis difficult.If the aim of this book is too be clear, the question of the metaphysics of Psychosynthesis must be addressed.In his article on Evolutionary Panentheism Murphy shows how some of history’s greatest intellectual giants have arrived at this concept.They have used different names, but enough common features recur to link them (Murphy, 2012).Evolutionary means that God (Brahman, the Spirit, the One) permeates immanent.God is in everything, but is greater than the created universe.Since completing my MA in Psychosynthesis (Sørensen, 2008), I have wanted to write a book about Roberto Assagioli’s system of psychological and spiritual development.A number of questions which I could not examine at the time remained unanswered.Does it follow then that one must “believe” in panentheism to practice Psychosynthesis?Not according to Assagioli and the spirit of Psychosynthesis.