Romantic intensity expresses the momentary value of acute emotions.Romantic profundity embodies frequent acute occurrences of intense love over long periods of time, along with a life experience that resonates in all dimensions, helping the individuals flourish and thrive.The second set of objections suggests that passionate love is unstable, exciting, and brief—and that this is contrary to the stable, routine, and long-term nature of marriage.
Romantic intensity expresses the momentary value of acute emotions.Romantic profundity embodies frequent acute occurrences of intense love over long periods of time, along with a life experience that resonates in all dimensions, helping the individuals flourish and thrive.The second set of objections suggests that passionate love is unstable, exciting, and brief—and that this is contrary to the stable, routine, and long-term nature of marriage.Tags: Museum Of Tolerance EssaysThe Basic Elements Of Academic Essay Writing AreSample Nursing Research PaperCan You Have Diagrams In An EssayEssay Editing Services TorontoActual Business Plan
Raquel Welch The notion that "love and marriage go together like a horse and carriage" is still widespread, but the arguments against it are gaining strength.
Addressing such arguments requires clarifying what we mean by profound love.
Marriage is a framework of living that includes other important factors besides love. Passionate love is a relatively short-term experience in our lives, and so the long-term aspects of love are of greater importance.
The first set of objections indicates that marriage is a social framework that exists within certain socioeconomic circumstances—and that the well-being of the couple requires this fact to be taken into account.
However, when long-term considerations of profundity are taken into account, the decision will typically prove to be a romantic disaster, involving misery and the feeling of having made a romantic compromise.
Love should have a central place in our life and our decision to marry or enter into other types of committed relationships.In light of the general improvement in living conditions in modern society, it's understandable that the value of socioeconomic advantages is given less weight than that of love.However, these advantages have not disappeared—they have become part of the factors that increase love.But only rarely in history has love been seen as the main reason for getting married.” Coontz further argues that "in many cultures, love has been seen as a desirable outcome of marriage but not as a good reason for getting married in the first place." Similarly, Pascal Bruckner (2013) argues that in the past, marriage was sacred, and love, if it existed at all, was a kind of bonus.Now that love has come to be seen as essential in marriage, love is perceived as sacred, and marriage as secondary.In our society, it appears that the value of such considerations is decreasing while that of love is increasing.The importance of love for both the establishment and the maintenance of marriage is greatest in Western and Westernized nations, which tend to have higher economic standards of living, higher marriage divorce rates, and lower fertility rates (Berscheid, 2010).Considering passionate romantic love as essential in marriage has upgraded the value of marriage, making it a top priority in our lives.It has also, however, made marriages more volatile and uncertain.The Recent Connection Between Love and Marriage The prevailing ideal that passionate love is essential in marriage is actually recently new.In her book on the history of marriage, Stephanie Coontz (2005) shows that this ideal became prevalent only about two centuries ago: "People have always fallen in love, and throughout the ages, many couples have loved each other deeply.