They give a description of what gravity waves are, a brief history of gravity waves, and a brief note as to why attempts to detect them are important. It contains, however, too much information in too little space.If this were your paper, I'd recommend either expanding the size of the introduction, or, even better, tightening the focus and leaving out some information.When you borrow a figure from another source, you should say something like, "Figure reproduced from " or "Figure reproduced from reference 8" in the figure caption. The transfer of mass between two gravitational wells ." leaves the reader wondering if the actual figure comes from reference 8, or whether reference 8 simply discusses the topic or contains a similar figure which inspired this one.Tags: Research Paper Over A Good Man Is Hard To FindEssay Book Fair BangladeshCritical Shakespeare EssaysAbstinence Research Paper OutlineDissertations On Property LawMaths Problem Solving Year 4Consumerism EssayBaruch College EssayTrig Homework HelpWriting Laboratory Reports Chemistry
gravwaves2This is a really good paper, so now lets trash it.
Seriously, I though it would be helpful for you if you could see a critique of this paper so that you could more easily see some of the things that were done right and that were done wrong. It is well organized, focused, and well polished (i.e., good grammar, good spelling, transitions between different discussions, etc.).
Have other's read your paper, and listen to their comments.
Accepting criticism is not easy, but it's the only way to learn to write.
One of the things I dislike about this paper is the way in which the figures are presented and referenced.
Each figure, table, etc., should be labeled with a number and a caption, i.e., "FIG. Artists depiction of mass transfer between two gravitational wells.As a result, it flows well --- it is easy and enjoyable to read. It could be a little more focused, and could use a stronger thesis statement. (It's not very flashy, and it wouldn't make a good advertisement for a TV show, but that's not the purpose of the abstract.) It clearly, concisely, and in order tells us what the paper will discuss.It is obvious from the text that the authors have a fairly good understanding of the subject, and for the most part their science and reasoning is sound. If I were doing research and wanted to know specific things about a specific topic, this abstract would let me know right away if the paper contains what I'm looking for. Take a look at the first two "introduction" paragraphs.Also notice that each new concept has at least one reference --- letting us know where they learned about it.Unless the idea you are discussing is your own original research, you should reference the source where you obtained the information.The third paragraph makes a transition from the introduction to the rest of the paper, telling us what they are going to discuss.Unfortunately, they only mention one source of gravity waves, while their paper goes on to discuss other sources and other topics as well.A good one or two sentence thesis statement is needed before they end their introduction. "In this paper we will describe five types of gravitational wave sources: orbiting masses, coalescence, mass transfer, ..., as well as several proposed methods of gravity wave detection."Notice how the descriptions of the various means of generating gravity waves are presented in a nice orderly way. This part of the paper flows very well --- you learn a lot of information without expending much time or effort to read or understand it.Furthermore, when you quote a recognized expert, it adds a certain assurance that what you are describing is not nonsense. It is related to what they are discussing, but is long and goes into more detail than the rest of their discussion.It is nothing too impressive, and I think that they could have paraphrased it and said it better!